英语语法高手请进

1,He aim his gun to the lion,fired and missed.
这里面是在aim后面加at吧? 此时后面fired and missed再句中作什么成分?
2,Is this area that the flood broke out?
这里面吧that改为where? 为什么要这样呢?、
3, Those who。。。。。 will succeed。
Those的后面为什么要加who呢? 这种结感觉是这样 解释不到原因
1,He aimed his gun to the lion,fired and missed.
这里面是在aim后面加at吧? 此时后面fired and missed再句中作什么成分?
2Is this area that the flood broke out?
麻烦把where换为介词再加代词再组成句子
谢谢

1. 没错,的确是把to改成at.
固定短语aim...at...,意思是“用/以/拿...瞄准....”。
fired and missed也是句子的谓语。该句有三个并列谓语,即aimed/fired/missed.

2. Is this area where the flood broke out? 表语从句
= Is this area the one where the flood broke out? 定语从句
= Is this area the one in which the flood broke out? 定语从句
= Is this area the one that the flood broke out in? 定语从句
该句无法直接换成“介词 + 代词”的表语从句。
因为它是表语从句,而非定语从句。

3. 这是定语从句的特殊规定。
如果先行词是those且指人时,此时定语从句的关系代词一般只能用who.
可以理解成:those who = those people who
先行词可以是名词,也可以是代词,甚至可以是一个句子,而those恰恰就是代词。

参考资料:英语牛人团

温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2011-01-12
1 不用加 at的; fired and missed在这里是动词的过去式做状语,表示主语的状态,有时侯动词的现在分词也可做壮语的
2 因为WHERE引导的是地点状语从句,而THAT引导名词性从句
3 与前面的进行对比,一个完整的句子,加WHO好一些
第2个回答  2011-01-12
1.aim 应该改为aimed,要保持时态的一致性。后面两个动词实际是和aimed并列的成分,表示几个动作连续发生。
2. area是指某个地点,后面使用定语从句应该由where来引导。
3. those属于先行词,后面的who是引导从句的,表示一类人。例如:
Those who don't give up easily will succeed.
第3个回答  2011-01-12
1. aim to do, aim at doing, aim at sth. ,所以这里应该用at. 另外,如果这句后面是 fired and missed, 则前面的aim应是aimed, 这样才能构成并列谓语。
2. 改为陈述句则是,This area is where the flood broke out. where 引导表语从句,并在从句中作状语, 用that则句意不完整。
3.that / those作先行词时,定语从句的关系词均不能用that,those指人则用who. 就是这样
第4个回答  2011-01-12
1,He aimed his gun at the lion,fired and missed.
并列句,fired and missed同aim一样都是谓语。
2,Is this area where the flood broke out?
中心词为地点时,定语从句用where或in which引导。
3, Those who。。。。。 will succeed。
who是引导词,引导定语从句啊!
相似回答