急！！！！！！麻烦帮忙把下面两段话译成英语

Question

分文理科可以有更多的时间来学习自己比较喜欢的科目，而且可以学的更好，如果什么都学习的话，高中一共有九门课，对每一课的学习都浅尝辄止，最终什么也学不好。而且如果理科和文科同时学习的话会有许多矛盾的，因为理科需要许多时间来做题，但是文科却要花许多时间来背书，这样在时间分配上就会出现许多问题。而且针对如今中国的教育趋势，很多大学都有偏文或偏理的倾向，包括以后走上工作岗位，也会有文理的区别，因此我方认为高中生应该分文理科。
的确，世界上存在达芬奇那样的奇才，然而这样的奇才又有多少呢？人的精力有限，天才式的人物在茫茫时间长河中只是璀璨却渺小的一颗星，99%的人都是靠自己的某一长项取得成功的。十八般武器样样精通的人毕竟少之又少，因此我们必须选择某一方面进行深入的系统的学习，而不是科科学，科科不精。
（班里要举行英语辩论赛，麻烦各位了，现在就要，译得好的话还会加分的，谢啦！）
不好意思一楼的亲，能不用翻译器么？好像不大准

Answer 1

Being able to choose to do only science or arts subjects, we can have more time to study on things we are more interested in and also allow us to learn them more in-depth. If we have to do all 9 subjects in high school, we can only learn the superficial from each of the subjects. Moreover the ways of learning arts and science are actually contradicting. For example, science requires lots of practices and exercises while arts needs more time on reciting, hence leads to problems in time management. Looking at the trends of education in China nowadays, many of the universities are more inclined to either arts or science. Also when we have to look for jobs in the future, the jobs are significantly different between science field and arts field. Therefore, I believe, there should be separation of arts and science subjects in high school.

Of course people that are as smart as Leonardo Da Vinci do exist, but how many of them are there? One has only limited energy and real genius is so rare, 99% of people succeed by making use of their advantages. After all there aren't many of them who are good at everything, therefore we should choose an area to learn systematically and to specialise in, in contrast to learn all the things and not being particularly good in any of them.

参考资料：自己翻着练习英语, 不是专业的, 希望有用吧~

Answer 2

Nothing science can have more time to study and to compare his own favorite subject, and can learn better, if anything to learn, then, a total of nine high school classes, for each lesson to learn all kick the tires and eventually learn anything bad. And if science and the arts while learning, then there will be many contradictions, because the science required to do a lot of time question, but the arts have to spend a lot of time to endorsement, so that the distribution in time there will be many problems. Today, China's education but also against the trend, many universities have a partial text, or the tendency of partial reasons, including the go after work, there will be the difference between liberal arts, so our high school students think that science should be nothing.
Indeed, the existence of the world, Leonardo da Vinci as a genius, but such a genius, how many do? A person's energy is limited, genius-like figure in the vast flow of history is just brilliant but tiny star in 99% of people are on their own success in a long entry. 18 as well versed in weapons, after all, very few people, so we have to choose one aspect of the system in-depth study, rather than subjects of science, Section of ill-equipped.

Answer 3

翻译：
Division of Arts and Sciences can give us more time to study the subjects we like, and learn more.If we learn every subject , and there are nine classes in high school, we just learn a little bit of every class, and eventually none of them were good enough. If we learn Sciences and Arts at the same time, there will be many contradictions, because the Sciences required a lot of time to do questions, but the Arts needed a lot of time to endorse, so there is a problem about how to distribute time. Today, against the trend of China's education, many universities have their own preference,Sciences or Arts, including when we go to work in the future, there will be a difference between Arts and Sciences,Therefore, we think there should be division of Arts and Sciences in high school.

Indeed, there is genius like Leonardo da Vinci in the world , but how many? A person's energy is limited, genius-like figure is just a brilliant but tiny star in the vast flow of history, 99% people succeed on one of their own strong features. After all,very few people skill in wielding the 18 kinds of weapons, so we have to choose one aspect of the system in-depth study, rather than learn them all, but good at nothing.

PS：要适当自己来写自己的辩论，不然是不会有提高的。

Answer 4

The segregation of Science and Arts subjects allows more time for one to focus on the subjects of his/her interests, so as to have a better mastery of these subjects.

There are all together 9 subjects in high school, if each and every one of these subjects are compulsary, focus would be diluted, resulting in partial knowlegde in all of these subjects.

There are also bound to be many conflicts if one is to take up Science and Arts subjects concurrently. For instance, Science subjects require time input in problem solving whilst Arts subjects require a large amount of time in memorising work. The allocation of time would become a major issue in this case.

Noting the recent trend in education in China, focus of individual tertiary education institution tends to be skewed towards either the Science school , or the Arts school, and this disparity continues into graduation, where different job scopes require disciplines in either Science or Arts. Thus, it is advisable to make that segregation in high school, so that students will be able to focus and to gain more in-depth knowledge of the subject of their interest.

Undeniably, there are genius like Da Vinci,who excelled in both disciplines, but such people constitues a very small fraction of our population. A person's resources are limited, thus, it is crucial that one uses the limited resource and to maximise its efficiency by focusing on a few key areas of study. In fact, most of us succeed based on a few traits, instead of knowing a little about everything and being goood at nothing.

PS: I figured your opposition may argue that focusing on few subjects may lead to biased views and say, a closed mindset, which can make you obsolete in this highly competitive and dynamic world, where the only thing that doesn't change is change itself. We used to argue that students from the science faculty can't write whilst students from the arts faculty can't count, lol...I personally feel that a little more exposure is always a plus, but time management may be a point of dispute here. Good luck to you. Cheers.