英语辩论赛“老人是否应该住在老人院里”反方,正方各要一份

好的加分

l正方:
In my point of view, old man should live in the beadhouse.
And that is a good choice for everyone.

First of all, it is good for the old man. In the beadhouse, there must be nurses and doctors who are good at how to deal with the old man's disease and accidence, so the old man can get health care at anytime. Also the beadhouse can provide special food for the old to feet their need. And all the diets are designed by Dietitians, so it is much better to the old man's health than the common food cook at home. Then there must be other person who may at the same age, so they can just chat with each other and never feel lonely.

On the other hand, it is also good for the kids. Their children is just about their best time of life to fight for a better salary or a better social status. They don't have that much time to care about their parents. So it may leads to two results. One is they spend most time on their parents, their parents get a good care. But they failed in their career. And another is they spend most one the work, and their parents won't take a good care.
But the result for parents is all the same---they feel sad either their children failed in their career or they don't be treated well.

As a conclusion, if the old men live in beadhouse, children can fight for their future and the old men can get a good care. It is the best choice for both.

老人我全部用的old man来写的,因为真的不知道有什么其他的专业词,对不起了。思路应该还是挺清晰的。写的很多,可以截一部分来用。
这个话题其实正方需要用事实和数据说话,而反方需要以情感人。如果正方在感情问题,亲情问题纠缠过多的话那就陷入了反方的圈套。毕竟中国人是非常重亲情和传统的国家。正方需要做的就是主要说明养老院比家里更专业,照顾的更到位,有专业的各种人员服务老人,老人在敬老院的幸福指数很高。住进养老院更有利于老人的健康等。同时辅助说明,如果在家里对谁都不好,希望孩子的事业成功,不想拖累孩子。这个问题不可多谈。正方基本就成功了。
正方讲的是理性,反方讲的就是感性。
反方:
From our perspective, old people shouldn't live in the beadhouse for the following reasons.

First of all, although the beadhouse may provide a good service for the old people's physical health, however, mental health is much more important than the physical health. Old people just want to live with their children which can provide them pure love. And they also can feel this love from daily life at home. We cannot deprive their right to love and be loved. Because they are your parents who raise you up, who care about you, who really love you. The birds even know to feed their parents back. What about the human beings? They don't want you to spend too much time on them, but it doesn't mean that they don't need you, need your love, need your care.

Secondly,if they live in the beadhouse, they won't feel happy. Since all the old people love the things doing as usual, it will be a huge change while they live in the beadhouse. They don't want anyting to change, especilly their home, they may cannot sleep for a very long time. And as usual, they may like to talk to their kids, teach their grandsons or granddaughters, chat with old friends, which make them happy. But all the things changed, they may feel miserable. That's the result we don't want to see.

So,for the reasons above, we don't agree that let old people live in the beadhouse.

终于写完了,感觉不是非常煽情,但是要点基本都写到了。这段话需要非常煽情,才能感动人。如果可以感动在场观众的话,那么基本就赢了。

写了这么多,希望能对你有用。
顺便把分给我吧。。。一个下午都在搞这个东西。。。最好能加加分。。。
嘿嘿。。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
相似回答