历史上，男性领导通常会导致我们的社会充满暴力和斗争。假如女性统治世界，我们的社会将更和平。

Question

Throughout history, male leaders often led our societies to be full of violence and conflict. If women governed the world, our society would be more peaceful. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

翻译：

历史上，男性领导通常会导致我们的社会充满暴力和斗争。假如女性统治世界，我们的社会将更和平。你在何种程度上同意或反对这个观点？

抛砖：

人类社会的发展过程中，总是充满各种矛盾和斗争，而历史上人类的领导多数都是男性，所以人们容易把暴力和战争归因于男性领导，但事实并非如此。很多国家与国家之间的矛盾，种族与种族的冲突，解决方法最终落在暴力和斗争上，无论是男性领导，还是女性领导，最后的选择都会是战争。

有些人认为女人个性中柔和的部分能够促进矛盾以和平的方式解决，我并不这样认为。领导之所以处在领导位置，多数是因为符合领导的基本要求，其中之一就是能够用暴力化解纷争。历史上，中国也出现过女性统治者，比如武则天和慈禧，两个人在夺权和在位的过程中，暴力纷争没有明显的减少，英国的女首相撒切尔夫人，更是派舰队绕了半个地球，去跟阿根廷作战，处于国家领导的位置，暴力斗争是有时是一种必然的选择，跟统治者的性别特征关系不大。

领导的性别对社会暴力和斗争的数量影响不大，女领导不一定会带来更多的和平。

这些是资料 麻烦能变成450字的 英文作文么

Answer 1

In the process of the development of human society,Always full of various contradictions and struggles,And in the history of mankind's leadership most are male.So people easily to violence and war attributed to male leaders.But that is not the case. Many of the contradictions between countries, racial and ethnic conflict, the solution eventually fell on violence and struggle, whether male or female leadership, leadership, the final choice would be war.
Some people think that woman character the downy part can promote contradiction resolved peacefully, I don't think so. Leadership is in leadership positions, mostly accord with the basic requirements of leadership, one is able to use violence resolving disputes.History, China also has appeared female rulers, such as wu zetian and two in cixi, power and in the process, violent conflict no significant reduction, British female prime minister Margaret thatcher, but also sent fleet around half of earth, to speak to Argentina combat, in a national leadership position, violent struggle is sometimes is an inevitable choice, with the rulers of the gender characteristics concern is not big.
Under the leadership of the gender of the social violence and the number of struggle is little affected, female leadership don't necessarily bring more peace.

那个，我用的是网上的在线翻译。。。。感觉还可以，你将就着用吧。。。本回答被网友采纳

Answer 2

敢情你这是叫我们给你翻译啊？

Answer 3

Types of social development process, is always filled with various contradictions and struggles that the history of mankind's leadership most are men, so people easily to violence and war attributed to male leaders, but that is not the case. Many of the contradictions between countries, racial and ethnic conflict, the solution eventually fell on violence and struggle, whether male or female leadership, leadership, the final choice would be war.

In the process of the development of human society,Always full of various contradictions and struggles,And in the history of mankind's leadership most are male.So people easily to violence and war attributed to male leaders.But that is not the case. Many of the contradictions between countries, racial and ethnic conflict, the solution eventually fell on violence and struggle, whether male or female leadership, leadership, the final choice would be war.
Some people think that woman character the downy part can promote contradiction resolved peacefully, I don't think so. Leadership is in leadership positions, mostly accord with the basic requirements of leadership, one is able to use violence resolving disputes.History, China also has appeared female rulers, such as wu zetian and two in cixi, power and in the process, violent conflict no significant reduction, British female prime minister Margaret thatcher, but also sent fleet around half of earth, to speak to Argentina combat, in a national leadership position, violent struggle is sometimes is an inevitable choice, with the rulers of the gender characteristics concern is not big.
Under the leadership of the gender of the social violence and the number of struggle is little affected, female leadership don't necessarily bring more peace.

Answer 4

Types of social development process, is always filled with various contradictions and struggles that the history of mankind's leadership most are men, so people easily to violence and war attributed to male leaders, but that is not the case. Many of the contradictions between countries, racial and ethnic conflict, the solution eventually fell on violence and struggle, whether male or female leadership, leadership, the final choice would be war.

Some people think that woman character the downy part can promote contradiction resolved peacefully, I don't think so. Leadership is in leadership positions, mostly accord with the basic requirements of leadership, one is able to use violence resolving disputes. History, China also has appeared female rulers, such as wu zetian and two in cixi, power and in the process, violent conflict no significant reduction, British female prime minister Margaret thatcher, but also sent fleet around half of earth, to speak to Argentina combat, in a national leadership position, violent struggle is sometimes is an inevitable choice, with the rulers of the gender characteristics concern is not big.

Under the leadership of the gender of the social violence and the number of struggle is little affected, female leadership don't necessarily bring more peace.

These are the material could become 450 word English composition