第1个回答 2014-04-17
Nowadays,some companies say that nobody can smoke in their offices.Some countries forbid smoking in public areas,this is a good action.Despite it takes some freedom of ours, as we all know,smoking can cause many deases,such as lung cancer.Smoking's effect to no smoking people is much more serious than smoking people.Passive smoking will get diseases quicker than other smoking people.So many people who don't smoke has a great opposioin of smoking.
翻译已完毕，望采纳！
第2个回答 2014-04-17
Now, some say that no one can smoke in their office. Some countries have banned smoking in public places, this is a good idea. Although it deprives us some freedom, as we know, smoking causes many diseases, such as: lung cancer. Impact on non-smokers smoke is even worse than the impact on the smoker himself. Passive people than smoking prevalence is higher. So a lot of non-smokers against smoking
第3个回答 2014-04-17
Nowadays,some of the departments claim that nobody can smoke in thier offices.Some of the countries have alreay banned punblic smoking.This kind of actions are very effective.Although some may think that it deprive our freedom,but like we know,smoking can cause a lot of diseases including lung cancer.The influnce of smoke is worse for the health of the second hand smoker than the smoker.That is the reason why a lof of people who do not smoke agaist such a manner like smoking in the public.本回答被网友采纳
第4个回答 2014-04-17
Now, some say that no one can smoke in their office. Some countries have banned smoking in public places, this kind of practice is very good. Though it takes away some of our freedom, as we know, smoking can lead to many diseases, such as: lung cancer. Effect of flue gas in never smokers more impact on smokers. Passive smoking prevalence rate is higher than the smokers. So a lot of people who don't smoke against smoking.
第5个回答 2014-04-17
你的汉语在哪里/
追问现在，有些单位宣称没有人可以在他们的办公室里吸烟。有些国家已经禁止在公共场合吸烟，这种做法很好。尽管它剥夺了我们一些自由，正如我们所知道的，吸烟会导致多种疾病，例如：肺癌。烟气对不吸烟者的影响有甚于对吸烟者本人的影响。被动吸烟比吸烟人患病率要高。所以很多不吸烟的人反对吸烟。