第1个回答 2012-09-02
先把它的主要内容写下来，然后谈谈文章的中心思想、要么写自己的感想。
观后感，就是看了一部电影或电视剧后，把具体感受和得到的启示写成的文章。所谓“感”，可以是从作品中领悟出来的道理或精湛的思想，可以是受作品中的内容启发而引起的思考与联想，可以是因观看而激发的决心和理想，也可以是因观看而引起的对社会上某些丑恶现象的抨击。观后感的表达方式灵活多样，基本属于议论范畴，但写法不同于一般议论文，因为它必须是在观看后的基础上发感想。要写好有体验、有见解、有感情、有新意的观后感，必须注意以下几点：
一、要将重点放在一个“感”字上
不少同学开始写观后感，往往将“观”的内容写得很长，总爱把故事情节从头到尾加以介绍，生怕读者不知其内容，而发表“感”的文字却很少，如一个同学在写《一个独生女的故事》观后感时，先将整个故事从头到尾讲述了一遍，先写张鸣鸣如何品学兼优，再写张鸣鸣的父亲突然去世，母亲因承受不了这一打击而重病缠身；接着写张鸣鸣从自己学梳头开始，怎样担负起繁重的家务，接受一个个严酷的考验，然后写她在社会的帮助下一天天长大。最后结尾时才写到：我要向张鸣鸣学习，不被困难所屈服，从小要学做自己能做的事。针对这样一篇结构的观后感，我首先肯定他看得很认真，记住了影片的情节，但从观后感的文体要求上看，是不合格的。因全文只有最后一句“感”，虽然这句“感”的内容贴切，但文章没抓住“感”这个重点，写偏了，好像一篇电影内容简介。我强调学生应以“感”为主，从文字上看，“感”的内容大约占影片主要内容的四、五倍。文中适当引用影片内容，是为“感”服务的。因此，引用电影内容只要三言两语，不要具体叙述，更不要什么细致的描写。观看了《伟人爱迪生》后，我要求学生：谁能用最简单的语言概括故事内容?有个同学说：本片主要讲述爱迪生从一个身无分文的打扫地下室的清洁工成长为一个举世闻名的大科学家的过程；还有个学生补充说：主要讲了他发明电灯的事，他给全世界带来了光明。我将两位同学的发言进行比较：前者准确些，后者只是无数发明中最突出的一项，并肯定他们能用简短的语言概括故事内容，然后让学生抓住一点谈自己的感受。如爱迪生刻苦钻研的精神，不怕失败的精神，敢于创新的精神等，这样写出来的文章就克服以叙述故事为主的毛病了，不仅突出“感”字，而且读后能感人。
二、“感”是重点，不等于离开“观”
有的同学写观后感，只是在开头提一下“观了某部影片后，大有启发”等字样，以后就脱离了原片，说上一通自己的感想，牛头不对马嘴，无实际意义。要让“观”和“感”相吻合。如观了《火烧圆明园》，我进行指导后让学生先打草稿，然后收了部分习作，发现有的同学“感”与“观”内在联系不紧，有的根本无联系，他们写了一下影片内容后，就写到日本帝国主义侵略中国，如何在中国烧、杀、抢。抓不住影片的主题思想。为了解决这个问题，我从中找了几篇写的好点儿的进行评讲、引路。有个叫王天波的同学在题为《落后就要挨打》一文的结尾时这样写到：影片中那几根石柱至今还挺立在圆明园的废墟上，仿佛在警示人们“落后就要挨打”，我们作为新中国的接班人，一定要学好本领，把祖国建设得更加强大，不让历史悲剧重演。在这段结尾中，习作者再次将“观”到的“几根石柱”抓住，发表“落后就要挨打”的“感”，使文章全文一体，使“感”发于“观”、“观”服务于“感”。
三、要联系实际而“感”
要写好“感”就该联系实际，深入发挥，把自己的“感”写深、写透。
这里的实际，不是单指自我实际，还包括他人实际，社会实际。
第2个回答 2012-08-31
地心历险记的观后感 I liked many aspects of the movie..Anita Briem was very likable and I have always liked Brendan Frasier. I thought the special effects were very good, and a lot of the 3D effects were a lot of fun. More than once, I wanted to reach out in front of me and grab something coming off the screen. The bad part, was that the plot was just plain silly. It tried to stay glued together like National Treasure, which was also far fetched, but it never really quite made it. While I realize this was an action/adventure movie, some of the sequences were just too outlandish to garner any believability. The original made in the late 50's had a greater impact on me than this one did. But to balance out this critique, it was an enjoyable movie and I don't regret seeing it in 3D. I just think that with a little more effort, it could have gone from a lightweight yet entertaining movie, to a really strong blockbuster.
第3个回答 2012-09-08
哈利波特 went to see the movie with three of my four kids this weekend, we were hoping that it would not drag, being so long. Having read the book, my oldest and I knew it was a long story with much to cover. Though there could have been traps to make it drag, we were very pleased with the fine way they found to smoothly link everything together and not lose the spirit of the things they had to leave in the book. We did enjoy the third HP movie, though we did find this one to be vastly more appealing to the movie series. This was a fine movie and all involved with its creation and presentation to the big screen for our enjoyment deserve kudos. Special effects were wonderful, and the devotion to the written story was exemplary! We only wish it would have been shown on our stealth cinema with stadium seating instead of the standard screen. Other than that, Ten stars for sure.