First, for the reason of US gun-free, there is no doubt that are the cases have been happened in America at present. So people realize that is necessary to carry out the gun-free to prevent. But there is a question, is it the hunter's fault that they hunt continuously and result to the species extinction?Obviously not, gun's usage depends on people who hold the gun. So gun-free is not a revolution to solve the fundamental problem.
Compare to China, China already stop the gun-used dozens years ago. That's why it has a comparatively safe environment. However, This is not the reason of requiring America to learn from China and go against their constitution . Just as Chinese Communist Party won't let other parties hold the rights, every contry has its own national situations.
I remember Obama mentioned to the gun-free long time ago, But until now, it is not carried out. There are still some shooting accidents happen in America's campus. Actually, it concerns the interests of different people, not all Americans agree with the gun-free policy, or this already is put into effect. For an unproper example, piracy can be widely seen in China, But Now legal copy is being supported, this means we have to pay for the copyright when using office software and even listening a song. Will people agree with that?We have already accustomed to pirate copy and free things, if now there is a decision that we have to stop using it, i think most people will oppose. This is the reason why the action to combat piracy have been not sucessful, it concerns the benifits of different people.
Gun can be used is America's constitution,its national situation, i think just forbid people to use gun is not the most suitable way. Maybe America need to focus on how to educate people to use Gun and how to improve the law of using gun.
追问不好意思,我这里还有一篇,愿意翻译不?
追答我看看
你发来看看